OUTSOURCING LAW

Insights on Effective Outsourcing from Bierce & Kenerson, P.C.


Home About Us Selecting Your Attorney Sponsors Careers Register Survey Contact Us Store Contribute an Article
 

Subscribe to Our
Newsletter:
Please Enter your
E-mail:
 

Text  HTML
AOL

Search Site:  



EVENTS

Seminars & Conferences

OUTSOURCED MANAGED
SERVICES
Call Centers
Service Level Management
Human Resources
Engineering
Debt/Tax Collection
Information Technology (IT)


WHITE PAPERS

Business Process Transformation:
Legal and Business Issues in Business Renewal and Sourcing Strategy

COMMUNITIES

Customer's Environment

Service Provider's Environment
Consultant's Role
Lawyer's Role

BUSINESS TOPICS
What is Outsourcing?
Why Should We Outsource?
When Not to Outsource
Definitions / Glossary
F.A.Q.S.
Economics
Basic Principles
Getting Started (New Service Providers)

Getting Started (Enterprise Customers)

Types of Outsourced Processes
Decision-making Process
Life Cycles / Phases
Deal Structures
Pricing
Best Practices
Failed Deals
Advanced Strategies
Trends
Venture Capitalists and Outsourcing
Business and Legal Factors
Unique Circumstances; Deal Timing
Viability

LEGAL TOPICS
Risk Management
Battle of Forms
Intellectual Property
Privacy Law
Human Resources
Taxation
Legislation
Compliance
Disputes
Litigation
Bankruptcy
International
Corporate Governance and Sarbanes-Oxley Act

RESOURCES
Humor in Outsourcing
Articles
Experts
Links
Newsletter
Case Studies
Press Room

SITE TOOLS
Search
Translate
Contact Us

SITE RULES
Privacy Policy
Terms of Access and Use
Client's Bill of Rights
Client's Confidential
Communications

 

Ipso Facto Clauses in Contracts.

Virtually every lawyer insists on a clause authorizing the client to terminate "for cause" (or otherwise forfeit or modify rights) if the other party becomes bankrupt, insolvent, fails to maintain a contractually specified financial condition or makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors. Such clauses permit termination of the agreement simply because of the other party's distressed financial condition. Such clauses are called "ipso facto" clauses.

Under current U.S. bankruptcy law, such clauses are not enforceable to enable a creditor to retain any of the debtor's property. 11 USC 362(l). The trustee may sell, use or transfer any debtor property, after notice and hearing. 11 USC 362(b). But ipso facto clauses may permit a services provider (other than a provider of "utility service") to terminate a contract for cause, provided that the trustee has not cured, or given "adequate assurances" of cure, for the default in connection with an "assignment and assumption" of an executory contract. 11 USC 365(b).

Indeed, an attempt to enforce such a clause could result in a violation of the "automatic stay" prohibiting filing lawsuits against bankrupt "debtors."

Related Topics:

Bankruptcy in Outsourcing
Automatic Stay

 
Home SEARCH TRANSLATE REGISTER PRIVACY POLICY TERMS OF ACCESS AND USE Contact Us
Copyright 2001-2007 by Outsourcing Law Global  LLC. All rights reserved.  Attorney Advertising