OUTSOURCING LAW

Insights on Effective Outsourcing from Bierce & Kenerson, P.C.


Home About Us Selecting Your Attorney Sponsors Careers Register Survey Contact Us Store Contribute an Article
 

Subscribe to Our
Newsletter:
Please Enter your
E-mail:
 

Text  HTML
AOL

Search Site:  



EVENTS

Seminars & Conferences

OUTSOURCED MANAGED
SERVICES
Call Centers
Service Level Management
Human Resources
Engineering
Debt/Tax Collection
Information Technology (IT)


WHITE PAPERS

Business Process Transformation:
Legal and Business Issues in Business Renewal and Sourcing Strategy

COMMUNITIES

Customer's Environment

Service Provider's Environment
Consultant's Role
Lawyer's Role

BUSINESS TOPICS
What is Outsourcing?
Why Should We Outsource?
When Not to Outsource
Definitions / Glossary
F.A.Q.S.
Economics
Basic Principles
Getting Started (New Service Providers)

Getting Started (Enterprise Customers)

Types of Outsourced Processes
Decision-making Process
Life Cycles / Phases
Deal Structures
Pricing
Best Practices
Failed Deals
Advanced Strategies
Trends
Venture Capitalists and Outsourcing
Business and Legal Factors
Unique Circumstances; Deal Timing
Viability

LEGAL TOPICS
Risk Management
Battle of Forms
Intellectual Property
Privacy Law
Human Resources
Taxation
Legislation
Compliance
Disputes
Litigation
Bankruptcy
International
Corporate Governance and Sarbanes-Oxley Act

RESOURCES
Humor in Outsourcing
Articles
Experts
Links
Newsletter
Case Studies
Press Room

SITE TOOLS
Search
Translate
Contact Us

SITE RULES
Privacy Policy
Terms of Access and Use
Client's Bill of Rights
Client's Confidential
Communications


IMPACT OF SARBANES-OXLEY UPON OUTSOURCING

Corporate Governance and Accountability under Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

© 2002 - 2005  Bierce & Kenerson, P.C


    On July 30, 2002, President George W. Bush signed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The bill establishes new rules of corporate governance and accountability for accounting for U.S. and foreign publicly owned companies whose shares are registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. If you work for such a company, you have some immediate actions for timely compliance, some by August 30, 2002.

    This legislation has potential importance to both outsourcers and their customers, as well as their accountants, executives, investment bankers, employees and attorneys.

    Scope of the Law. Enacted in the wake of a series of corporate accounting scandals, this vast and sweeping legislation establishes a public accounting oversight board, adopts certain minimal measures to preserve auditor independence, amends federal security laws to hold insiders and corporate executives and directors to higher standards of care in trading securities (including blackout periods during which such trading is prohibited), increases and extends corporate disclosures of accounting matters, sets standards for "corporate and criminal fraud accountability" and hardens the penalties for "white collar crime." For particular provisions on corporate responsibility for financial reports and the accuracy of financial reports (including "off balance sheet transactions"), see our copy of the law at http://www.outsourcing-law.com/Sarbanes-Oxley_legislative_text.htm

    Study on Manipulative Accounting. Investment bankers will now become the subject of a new SEC study. But the study will go further, covering topics that affect virtually every publicly traded outsourcing services provider and its methods of operation. The study will review, among other issues relating to Enron and Global Crossing's bankruptcies, the role of investment bankers and other advisors:

in creating and marketing transactions which may have been designed solely to enable companies to manipulate revenue streams, obtain loans, or move liabilities off balance sheets without altering the economic and business risks faced by the companies or any other mechanism to obscure a company's financial picture.

    Impact of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 on Outsourcing Service Providers. For outsourcing service providers, the new law creates the risk that the SEC might seek to impose penalties for failure to adopt conservative accounting principles. We think that this law could create challenges for outsourcers that adopt the percentage of completion method of accounting, which may be appropriate but nonetheless perhaps not as credible or conservative as the "as collected" basis. Take our Survey on related accounting issues.

    Impact of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 on Employees. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 protects employees from termination or other major adverse effect if they report alleged violations of the accounting rules or corporate governance requirements of that law. For a copy of the act as it applies to employees, please refer to our copy of the law at http://www.outsourcing-law.com/Sarbanes_Oxley_legislative_text.htm.  

    Please note that this gives new protections to whisteblowers who are employees, but also to non-employees as well.  Please refer to our copy of the law at http://www.outsourcing-law.com/Sarbanes_Oxley_ACT_2002_legislative_text.htm

    Impact of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 on the Role of Attorneys in Outsourcing. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 on corporate governance and accountability requires attorneys to take their concerns about accounting treatment to in-house lawyers and ultimately to the Board of Directors. Law firms assisting parties to an outsourcing transaction should consult with their clients concerning the accounting treatment implicit in the transactional structures. 

    Impact of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 on Venture Capitalists.  The Act will give  pause to venture capitalists who fund start-up outsourcing services providers.  It raises the legal liability of VC's who serve on boards of directors, particularly if the portfolio company is targeting an IPO and board membership remains an important component of the VC relationship, compensation, "protection" of VC-organized investor interests and generally investment management.

    Impact of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 on International Outsourcing Services Providers.  Being incorporated outside the United States may have its advantages as well as its disadvantages.  Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, foreign companies whose shares are traded on U.S. stock exchanges must comply with new obligations on financial reporting, audit and corporate governance.   Foreign services providers such as Accenture Ltd., of Bermuda, that were organized outside the United States prior to relevant "cutoff" dates are likely not to suffer the consequences of U.S. governmental retaliation for foreign "inversion" operations.   Unless their securities are listed on a U.S. securities exchange, such foreign services providers may enjoy regulatory freedoms, but such freedoms may elicit suspicion by investors and prospective customers due to the lower level of corporate governance discipline and public disclosure of material information. If you have any question about this process, please contact one of our attorneys.

Articles
Sarbanes-Oxley and Corporate Governance
SEC Staff's Report on Off-Balance Sheet Transactions under Section 401(c) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Home SEARCH TRANSLATE REGISTER PRIVACY POLICY TERMS OF ACCESS AND USE Contact Us
Copyright 2001-2007 by Outsourcing Law Global  LLC. All rights reserved.  Attorney Advertising