OUTSOURCING LAW

Insights on Effective Outsourcing from Bierce & Kenerson, P.C.


Home About Us Selecting Your Attorney Sponsors Careers Register Survey Contact Us Store Contribute an Article
 

Subscribe to Our
Newsletter:
Please Enter your
E-mail:
 

Text  HTML
AOL

Search Site:  



EVENTS

Seminars & Conferences

OUTSOURCED MANAGED
SERVICES
Call Centers
Service Level Management
Human Resources
Engineering
Debt/Tax Collection
Information Technology (IT)


WHITE PAPERS

Business Process Transformation:
Legal and Business Issues in Business Renewal and Sourcing Strategy

COMMUNITIES

Customer's Environment

Service Provider's Environment
Consultant's Role
Lawyer's Role

BUSINESS TOPICS
What is Outsourcing?
Why Should We Outsource?
When Not to Outsource
Definitions / Glossary
F.A.Q.S.
Economics
Basic Principles
Getting Started (New Service Providers)

Getting Started (Enterprise Customers)

Types of Outsourced Processes
Decision-making Process
Life Cycles / Phases
Deal Structures
Pricing
Best Practices
Failed Deals
Advanced Strategies
Trends
Venture Capitalists and Outsourcing
Business and Legal Factors
Unique Circumstances; Deal Timing
Viability

LEGAL TOPICS
Risk Management
Battle of Forms
Intellectual Property
Privacy Law
Human Resources
Taxation
Legislation
Compliance
Disputes
Litigation
Bankruptcy
International
Corporate Governance and Sarbanes-Oxley Act

RESOURCES
Humor in Outsourcing
Articles
Experts
Links
Newsletter
Case Studies
Press Room

SITE TOOLS
Search
Translate
Contact Us

SITE RULES
Privacy Policy
Terms of Access and Use
Client's Bill of Rights
Client's Confidential
Communications

 

Economic Crime: Abuse of Telephone Records

© 2007 William B. Bierce. All rights reserved

            On January 12, 2007, President Bush signed the Telephone Records and Privacy Act of 2006.   The new law makes it a crime to buy or sell fraudulently obtained “confidential phone records information of a covered entity.”   The law responds to a hole in the enforcement of rights of individuals whose telephone records were obtained fraudulently.

             The law does permit trade in phone records where the “customer” had given authority to do so.  The law merely prohibits acts of “knowingly and intentionally” selling, transferring, buying or attempts to sell, transfer or buy, confidential phone records information” of a “covered entity,” without “prior authorization” from the customer to whom such confidential phone records information relates, or knowing or having reason to know such information was obtained fraudulently.    New 18 U.S.C. 1039(b) and (c).  The penalty is 10 years’ in prison and can be increased by 5 years for various aggravating circumstances.

             The law relates only to the telephone records of a “telecommunications carrier” (under section 3 of the Federal Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 153), and includes any provider of IP-enabled voice services such as Skype. 

             Internationally, service providers having access to such records should be aware that this law is intended to have “extraterritorial” effect, giving U.S. courts extraterritorial jurisdiction over covered offenses.   New U.S.C. 1039(f).

             The focuses on specific harms incurred in response to investigations by Hewlett-Packard’s Chairman of supposed boardroom leaks.

Further Readings:

Call Centers

Failed Deals

Risk Management

Privacy Law

Legislation

Compliance

Home SEARCH TRANSLATE REGISTER PRIVACY POLICY TERMS OF ACCESS AND USE Contact Us
Copyright 2001-2007 by Outsourcing Law Global  LLC. All rights reserved.  Attorney Advertising